← Means of Power

Global · Politics & Governance · Great Power Geopolitics

Who or which institutions controls the world?

No single ruler: global power split between veto, dollar and the bomb

Summary

A Justice Council analysis finds no single power runs the world: dominance is split between the UN Security Council veto, the dollar-based financial system, and nine nuclear-armed states, all facing Global South pressure.

What it argues

  1. Security Council vetoPolitics

    The five permanent UN Security Council members hold a veto the Charter makes almost impossible to remove. In 2024-25 the US, Russia and China each cast vetoes on different issues, showing rivalry rather than a unified bloc. Formal world power is concentrated in five states, but they do not act as one.

  2. Nuclear-armed states' edgePolitics

    Nine nuclear-armed states hold a military advantage over the rest of the world. They are expanding their arsenals rather than shrinking them, locking in that advantage. Military dominance rests with the nuclear club and is being reinforced, not reduced.

  3. Global South pushes backPolitics

    The African Union, China's Global South diplomacy and BRICS are contesting the current order. The analysis finds they are contesting the order rather than replacing it. Challengers are pressing the dominant powers but have not displaced them.

  4. Reform needs the P5Politics

    Proposed fixes include limiting the veto in mass-atrocity cases and enlarging the Council along the African Union's Ezulwini model. Any such change needs the consent, or at least the abstention, of the five permanent members. Reform of the Council depends on the very powers it would constrain.

  5. Dollar and Western lenders rule financeEconomics

    Financial power rests with the US dollar and Western-led lenders such as the IMF. Within BRICS, India's resistance to moving away from the dollar suggests the challenge to this system is limited. The dollar-centred financial order faces pressure but no unified alternative.

  6. IMF voting weight proposalEconomics

    A proposed remedy is giving developing countries more voting weight at the IMF. Like Council reform, this would require the agreement of the dominant powers that currently hold the weight. Rebalancing finance faces the same consent problem as rebalancing the Council.

Key points

  • No single actor controls world institutions; dominance is shared among three systems.
  • The Security Council veto, locked in by the UN Charter, gives five states near-permanent formal power.
  • Nuclear-armed states are expanding arsenals, entrenching rather than easing military dominance.
  • The US dollar and Western-led lenders anchor financial power despite Global South pressure.
  • All proposed reforms require the consent of the powers they would constrain.

Open questions

  • Whether any limit on the Security Council veto for mass-atrocity cases will gain the consent of the five permanent members.
  • Whether Council enlargement along the African Union's Ezulwini model will advance.
  • Whether developing countries will gain more voting weight at the IMF.
  • Whether BRICS and the Global South can mount a unified challenge given divisions such as India's stance on the dollar.

Sources